/
31.08.2026 at 08:44 pm
←
→
Cuttings

Agentic AI Might Make Bash Immortal

Good old futuristic Bash.
Table of Contents

I've been playing with agents and agentic coding a lot recently.

One thing I kept noticing, from the tool calls - it was Bash.

All the way down.

That... piqued my curiosity.

I Had A Phase

I had a phase where I moved all my scripts from Bash to Python. (Which is a language I really love.)

Throughout that period, I read decades' worth of arguments predicting that Bash would die. That Bash was living on borrowed time.

Eventually though, I came back to my senses. And to Bash.

Because - outside of things where I actually need the fancier side of dynamic Python - there was just something about Bash. No, I'm not romantic about software. But:

And so can AI

And now, with the agentic stuff, I kinda realize: for AIs, Bash is almost ideal.

Compare clicking through folders and menus, vs typing:

find . -name "_.pdf"
rg "limitation" .
git diff
pytest
python extract.py judgment.pdf

The above is easier for computers.

'Ugliness' is relative. Bash is not ugly or intimidating to a machine. Bash is compact, deterministic, scriptable, inspectable, universal. Everything humans (might) dislike about Bash are kind of irrelevant to AI.

And therefore:

...Which means that Bash might ultimately win the longevity contest.

So after 50 years of increasingly elaborate GUIs, we may only now realize how we accidentally built the ideal AI-computer interface back then, in the 1970s.

The irony is almost perfect. Hmm.

Filed under:
#
#
Words: 359 words approx.
Time to read: 1.44 mins (at 250 wpm)
Keywords:
, , , , , , , , ,

Latest Comments

© Wan Zafran. See disclaimer.