/
27.04.2020 at 07:11 pm
Cuttings

How Science Should Be

Sticking to the science.

Funny that I should find this succinct definition on scientific exploration/discussion from a Reddit thread concerning Zahi Hawass:

... It would be nice if, just for once, we could have a discussion about this social science that addresses: here's what we have observed; here is how we observed it; here's our conclusions; here's how we derived those conclusions; here's what is limited about our conclusions; here's what we don't yet know; here's what I think happened; here's what we still have to observe; here's what we should look for next time we do a study on this topic; etc.

Much like the idea that a mature mind requires that you be able to entertain others' thoughts without having to accept it, consider this:

... If you can't entertain another person's ideas and beliefs, you don't truly know the argument.


Filed under:
#
Words: 151 words approx.
Time to read: 0.60 mins (at 250 wpm)
Keywords:
, , , , , , , , ,

Other suggested posts

  1. 11.06.2022 at 11:30 am / Salted Correspondences
  2. 23.02.2021 at 09:34 pm / Counsel Citing Adverse Authorities
  3. 05.02.2020 at 10:26 pm / Nostalgic Raging Streets
  4. 14.01.2020 at 01:24 pm / Third Time's A Charm
  5. 03.12.2017 at 12:00 am / Declarative, Imperative, Functional Sandwiches
  6. 08.02.2016 at 12:00 am / Eye to Eye (Jonathan Young's Version)
  7. 19.07.2015 at 12:00 am / Deadened Demonyms
  8. 18.05.2015 at 12:00 am / Indian Judicial Writing
  9. 03.07.2013 at 12:00 am / Craft Versus Discipline
  10. 16.08.2010 at 12:00 am / Lost Nuances in 'Ivan the Terrible'
© Wan Zafran. See disclaimer.