/
27.04.2020 at 07:11 pm
Cuttings

How Science Should Be

Sticking to the science.

Funny that I should find this succinct definition on scientific exploration/discussion from a Reddit thread concerning Zahi Hawass:

... It would be nice if, just for once, we could have a discussion about this social science that addresses: here's what we have observed; here is how we observed it; here's our conclusions; here's how we derived those conclusions; here's what is limited about our conclusions; here's what we don't yet know; here's what I think happened; here's what we still have to observe; here's what we should look for next time we do a study on this topic; etc.

Much like the idea that a mature mind requires that you be able to entertain others' thoughts without having to accept it, consider this:

... If you can't entertain another person's ideas and beliefs, you don't truly know the argument.


Filed under:
#
Words: 151 words approx.
Time to read: 0.60 mins (at 250 wpm)
Keywords:
, , , , , , , , ,

Other suggested posts

  1. 09.07.2023 at 11:38 am / Non-Dissonant Speed Keybindings
  2. 11.02.2021 at 12:56 am / 46 Simple Python Exercises/#01
  3. 04.06.2020 at 05:25 pm / Music and Neural Pathways
  4. 22.08.2018 at 02:13 pm / Heinrich Schliemann's Learning Method
  5. 24.10.2015 at 12:00 am / Salomon v Salomon is Antiquated
  6. 28.09.2015 at 12:00 am / Mocking the Law - Excessive Judicial Discretion
  7. 19.07.2015 at 12:00 am / Deadened Demonyms
  8. 20.06.2015 at 12:00 am / Mike Tyson on (His) Lawyers
  9. 18.05.2015 at 12:00 am / Indian Judicial Writing
  10. 20.04.2012 at 12:00 am / A Misty Morgue's Bat
© Wan Zafran. See disclaimer.